Let's call it the "shoe on the other political foot" argument.
How many times have you heard media critics argue that a particular media outlet – The New York Times is the villain of choice for the right and Fox News for the left – might have covered a story or have covered said story more intensely if the sin or crime in question had been committed by a leader on the opposing side?
It's a popular argument, quite frankly, because it is often a valid argument. Why did so many newsroom feminists cut President Bill Clinton so much slack? Why do some conservatives still think Rush Limbaugh belongs in the choir of cultural conservatives?
The same thing happens with ecclesiastical shoes on the feet of powerful sinners. But this syndrome is not taking place, at the moment, in mainstream coverage of the tragic auto accident in which Episcopal Bishop Heather Elizabeth Cook of Maryland hit and killed 41-year-old cyclist Thomas Palermo, a father of two. Driven by powerful early coverage in The Baltimore Sun and follow-up work at The Washington Post, this story is now being pushed past the ugly details and into larger questions, both legal and theological.
The key questions: Was this a hit-and-run accident? What caused the bishop to hit a bike in such an open piece of road, with excellent sight lines? Should an earlier DUI – involving alcohol and marijuana – have prevented her selection as a bishop? Here is the gripping top section of the major Sun report: