It's amazing how many different subjects people are arguing about in the wake of the shocking White House win by Citizen Donald Trump.
There is, of course, the whole CNN "whitelash" angle, which fits nicely with trends – real ones, trends seen in the exit polls – that make the Democratic Party establishment feel better about itself.
Then there is the more specific, and accurate, point that Hillary Rodham Clinton lost the White House because of a culture gap between her campaign (as opposed to those run by her husband) and the labor, working-class, heavily Catholic culture of the pivotal "Rust Belt" states – such as Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin.
You put all of that together, while highlighting the valid religion-trends angles, and you get a headline like this from The American Conservative magazine (a journal of cultural conservatism, not Republican Party orthodoxy):
White Christian Apocalypse?
That’s not what it means for America to become majority-minority.
Now, the byline on this think piece belongs to a scholar whose work is familiar to any modern reader interested in global and national trends linked to Christian life and demographics – that of historian Philip Jenkins, best known as the author of "The Next Christendom: The Coming of Global Christianity" and numerous other important books. He currently holds a joint appointment as professor of the Humanities in history and religious studies at Penn State University and as distinguished professor of history at Baylor University.
This piece is must reading for anyone seeking to understand trends linked to the potential influence of the church – minus ethnic adjectives – in the coming decades. Most of all, Jenkins believes that journalists and other public thinkers need to adopt a broader definition of the word "white." Thus: