Well, a reporter researching Judge Samuel Alito can't turn to a much better source than this. Here is the Associated Press report by Gina Holland that is defining the first wave of MSM coverage.
Alito, a Catholic, is opposed to abortion, his 90-year-old mother forthrightly told reporters in New Jersey. As an appeals court judge, he held that states can require women seeking abortions to notify their spouses. The Supreme Court disagreed.
Actually, I would have preferred to hear more from Alito's mother. Luckily, another AP reporter did land an actual quotation while researching the man who -- ALL TOGETHER NOW! Let me HEAR you! -- would "become the fifth Catholic on the nine-member court."
Here are the "Mamma mia!" quotes from the wire-service profile by Maryclaire Dale:
Alito's mother, Rose, who will turn 91 in December, spent Monday fielding congratulatory telephone calls from her home in Hamilton, N.J., a Trenton suburb. "I'm so excited I can't even express myself," she said.
More candid that her son might wish, she said, "I think he was upset that he didn't get there in the first shot, that Miers got it." That was a reference to Bush's choice of Harriet Miers, since withdrawn.
If confirmed, Alito would be the fifth Catholic on the Supreme Court. "Of course he's against abortion," his mother said, another comment supporters in Washington might wish she'd held back.
This is actually a nice report by Dale, with concise quotes by people on both sides of the judiciary aisle who have had experience working with this man.
Still everyone knows that we are now facing a tsunami of coverage on abortion rights. It is crucial to note -- again -- that we know what Alito thinks about some restrictions on abortion rights. Note the word restrictions. This is crucial because many Democrats also favor increased restrictions on abortion, even while they do not favor a complete ban on all abortions.
So once again we face that question: What is the centrist position on abortion?
If liberals back abortion on demand and conservatives favor a complete ban, what do people in the middle believe about abortion and how might America reach such a centrist position? The even tougher question: Is compromise possible under Roe?
With that in mind, Democrats who want to see the pro-life left and pro-life middle liberated once again to back Democratic candidates may want to read this recent column -- "Support Choice, Not Roe" -- by that noted Religious Right patriarch Richard Cohen of The Washington Post.
I realize that many of you have already seen this piece. Still, for those who have not, Cohen raised many, may eyebrows inside the Beltway way, way up high when he wrote:
The antiabortion movement has made headway. That shift in sentiment is not apparent in polls because they do not measure doubt, only position: for or against. But between one and the other, black or white, is a vast area of gray where up or down, yes or no, fades to questions about circumstance: Why, what month, etc.? Whatever the case, the very basis of the Roe v. Wade decision -- the one that grounds abortion rights in the Constitution -- strikes many people now as faintly ridiculous. Whatever abortion may be, it cannot simply be a matter of privacy.
Here we go (with the second piece of art offering a tribute to young master Jeremy Lott): Bombs away.