Wow. Reader Janette Kok dropped us a note noting the radical difference taken in the Time's article on the papal trip to Turkey, in comparison to that in Newsweek, which, in fairness, was written by a ringer -- Catholic scholar George Weigel.
The Newsweek piece is about the important ecumenical trip the pope planned long ago that has been changed, radically, by the tempest over his remarks about Christianity, Islam and human reason.
The Time piece by Jeff Israely focuses totally on Islam and politics, with little or no content on the original papal goal of pushing for human rights and religious liberty in Turkey (with a special emphasis on the plight of Orthodox Christians). Everything starts with the headline, which is "The Pope Tones Down His Act in Turkey -- Long known for his rigid thinking, Benedict XVI shows new flexibility in trying to mend fences in the wake of his controversial speech about Islam."
No, I didn't make that up. Read the article for yourself.
Meanwhile, one of the early Associated Press reports contains a fine, concise paragraph of statistics -- a wire-service basic -- and then a historical paragraph that is, to say the least, puzzling or incomplete.
First the statistics:
Of Turkey's 70 million people, some 65,000 are Armenian Orthodox Christians, 20,000 are Roman Catholic, and 3,500 are Protestant, mostly converts from Islam. Another 2,000 are Greek Orthodox and 23,000 are Jewish. The European Union has called on Turkey to expand religious freedoms.
So far, so good. Then comes this:
The pope planned to travel to Istanbul later Wednesday to meet Bartholomew I, leader of the world's 300 million Orthodox Christians. The two major branches of Christianity represented by Bartholomew and Benedict split in 1054 over differences in opinion on the power of the papacy. The two spiritual heads will meet in an attempt to breach the divide and reunite the churches.
Well now. Papal authority certainly was an issue, but I think the great ecumenical schism was a bit more complex than that and it involved more than "opinion." Click here for background. However, I will admit that this question looms in a discussion of wire-service coverage of complex theological issues: How many newspaper readers have heard of the Nicene Creed, let alone the filioque clause?
Meanwhile, does anyone on either side of the schism think that the pope and the patriarch are actually meeting "in an attempt to breach the divide and reunite the churches"? That's overstating the matter a bit.
By the way, has anyone seen MSM coverage noting that the leadership of the massive Greek Orthodox Church may have a different take on Turkey entering the European Union than the tiny church that remains based in Istanbul? Greece is not a minor country in the Orthodox East.