Godbeat pro Bob Smietana wrote a story this week exploring whether churches will keep sponsoring Boy Scout troops or drop their affiliation given the organization's new gay-friendly membership policy.

It's a timely, logical religion angle. (Others who have covered that angle include ABC News and the Birmingham News.)

The lede:

For the Rev. Ernest Easley, the decision to cut ties with the Boy Scouts was simple.
The Bible says homosexuality is a sin. The Boy Scouts do not.
"We are not willing to compromise God's word," said Easley, pastor of the 2,300-member Roswell Street Baptist Church in Marietta, Ga., which has sponsored Boy Scout Troop 204 since 1945.
Easley, chairman of the Southern Baptist Convention's executive committee, said his church will shut down its troop at end of the year, over a recently adopted policy to allow openly gay scouts. He's urging other Baptists to do the same.

I first saw the story (one version of it, anyway) Thursday on USA Today's website, where it carried this headline:

Religious regretfully sever Scout sponsorships

Huh?

At this point, I should remind GetReligion readers that reporters typically do not write their own headlines. So I'm assuming that Smietana didn't craft that one.

But it struck me as awkward on more than one level. "Religious" seems especially vague. And while I assume the headline writer means that those severing ties are doing so with regrets, the statement also could be interpreted as an editorial comment, as in, "How dare they?"

On Friday morning, a truncated version of the same story (read: stripped to its bare bones) appeared on Page 1 of the USA Today dead-tree edition that I picked up in my driveway.

The headline on that version:

Churches sever Scout sponsorship

That prompted the media watchdog site FAIR to complain that the front-page headline was misleading:

Except the article doesn't report what the headlines claim at all. The article quotes one church leader, of Roswell Street Baptist Church in Marietta, Georgia, who says he's going to stop sponsoring a Scout troop. Then it says:
Roswell Street is one of the first churches to cut ties with the Scouts over the new policy. Southeast Christian Church in Louisville, a 23,000-member megachurch, has also announced plans to shut down its troop. Other critics of the new policy, which doesn't take effect until January 2014, are taking a wait-and-see approach.
So: "Two Churches Sever Scout Sponsorship" would be a more accurate headline..

Meanwhile, the same lede that I copied above appeared on the story that Smietana wrote for his hometown paper, The Tennessean in Nashville, Tenn. (Gannett owns USA Today and The Tennessean.)

Except this was the headline:

Boy Scouts' gay policy hasn't driven Middle TN church sponsors away

Huh?

Are troops leaving or not? Well, as Smietana explained on Twitter, the national version of the story highlighted churches leaving, while the local version found less inclination to sever ties:

@tedolsen @martinfking Two different version of the story -- Nashville versus national. No rush to cut ties here in Music City
— Bob Smietana (@bobsmietana) May 31, 2013

So there you have it. Bottom line: It's a crazy world out there on the Godbeat. Especially when headline writers and multiple versions of the same story get involved.