Oh. My. Word.
To the long list of 21st century expectations of journalists, the Washington Post apparently has piled on another: biblical exegesis by reporters.
Talk about the media version of a train wreck. This will be painful. I apologize in advance.
The story at issue involves a "mostly male" transgender refused service by a barber who says he doesn't cut women's hair.
The Post's lede sets the scene:
Kendall Oliver’s hair looked just like that of the man who was comfortably seated in the next chair over at the barbershop. Closely trimmed on the sides, a little longer on top — and ready for a trim.
Oliver asked for the same cut. Yet the owner of the barbershop turned Oliver away — telling Oliver, an Army veteran, that he won’t cut women’s hair because he believes the Bible forbids it.
Oliver is transgender. And with that, the Army reservist in the Los Angeles area became the latest citizen at the center of a recurring American debate: Where does freedom of religion end and discrimination begin?
Down a little deeper in the story, the Post attempts ("to make an effort at; try; undertake; seek") to explain the Bible.